On 17 October 2011 11:36, marti.ma...@littlecms.com <marti.ma...@littlecms.com> wrote: > This was done on purpose, and the reason was the structures I'm using > to store data are not efficient for delete operations. Rather, it wold > be easier to use a higher level structure tied to application behavior.
Right, makes sense. I wanted to make sure I was doing the right thing not "working around" the problem. > It may seem an overkill for small operations, but if you have the UI > code already written, please take a look and you will probably find > you are already using something like that for storing widget references > or additionat UI data. Well, this is for a command line application, but you've described pretty much what I've done. Thanks for clearing things up. Richard. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct _______________________________________________ Lcms-user mailing list Lcms-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user
