yah i am doing the same. Assume that the tree A=>B=>C=>D=>obj
i have to find obj, A is root and B C D are subtrees in the earlier i give A as basedn and do subtree search. Now i am giving A=>B=>C=>D as basdn and searching in that container. I felt i know the exact path they why do i have a ldap_search .. It has to search that specific container once. is it possible to read the object with out doing a search.. originally problems comes here, I have two objects obj1,obj2 in D they are belongs two same objectClasses. My search filter will specify the object classes only. So i know the name so straigtaway i should read to avoid this confliction and to improve the speed too. How do i ? thanks in advace, -"kalyan" > For your search, use the dn of the entry as the search base, use "base" > as the scope, and use the trivial filter objectclass=*. > > Jon Roberts > www.mentata.com --- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE as the SUBJECT of the message.
