troy, * Troy Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-20 16:57]: > So why is there a flame war about this? Are the groupOfNames flag > bearers getting paid by this vendor to keep the FUD going? Probably > not. [...] > I'm getting a bit annoyed with the dogmatism of some folks in this > debate. [...] > By engaging in a flame for or against groupOfUniqueNames, you're > simply delaying adoption. > > To the groupOfNames purists:
oh please. this pathetic "groupOfNames vs. groupOfUniqueNames" is rather tedious (red herring, anyone?). as long as you just store DNs in the (unique)member attribute there is no fricking difference whatsoever. and most people only store DNs in uniqueMember, even if they *could* store some additional info (to identify otherweise identical DNs). since noone seems to need the additional info uniqueMember offers most people just go with member/groupOfNames. as simple as that. besides, plone is GPL and it should be rather trivial to replace groupOfUniqueNames with groupOfNames if one really wanted to (not that it improved or changed anything). regards, -p.schober -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - vienna university computer center Universitaetsstrasse 7, A-1010 Wien, Austria/Europe Tel. +43-1-4277-14155, Fax. +43-1-4277-9140 --- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE as the SUBJECT of the message.
