Giovanni Baruzzi wrote: > Not with a simple load balancer. There Are products that do implement that, > but they are named "proxies" (SUN).
IMO no matter LOAD balancers or proxies are used the LDAP client application has to simply reconnect to the same hostname:port. I fail to see how a 2nd Sun Directory Proxy can take over an active LDAP session without the LDAP client reconnecting. Giovanni, please explain in detail. Ciao, Michael. > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: qazmlp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2006 11:06 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: [ldap] Re: AW: Load balancers for LDAP connections?? > > Thanks for all the detailed that you had provided. > > Now, I have a question related to the feasibility of Transparent Failover > during the Load balancer failures. > > Assume there are 2 Load balancers configured in Active/Hot Standby > redundancy mode. Assume the Clients have setup sessions towards the Active > load balancer. What happens to the session, connection, when this Active > load balancer fails? Will the Failover to the other load balancer, be > transparent to the Client? Is it feasible to achieve it? --- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE as the SUBJECT of the message.
