Hi, "François Beretti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Dieter, > > thank you very much for your answer > > yes this is a part of what I need. I also need some additional > information that are usefull to some directory servers (for example: > wether the attribute has to be indexed or not, or the database field > name for Tivoli DS, or the possible superior classes for MS A.D., or > the default ACI for Novell eDirectory, etc.). > > So I am looking for a format that can be easily extended to receive > the information I need. DSMLv1 seems to be extensible (the XML Schema > does not prevent it). But somebody said that the XML Schema provided > with the spec ( http://xml.coverpages.org/dsmlV1-schema.xsd ) is not > valid because XML Schema was not released at the time DSMLv1 spec was > written. If somebody has a valid version... > > In fact I just need something quite clean to base my work on.
You have the choice either to use LDIF or DSML, I personally prefer DSML if possible, but it is not widely supported. I didn't have any problems with dsml-schema.xsd, so why not use it. For testing purpose you may have a look at dsmltools. http://www.dsmltools.org/ -Dieter -- Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung http://www.dkluenter.de GPG Key ID:8EF7B6C6 --- You are currently subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE as the SUBJECT of the message.
