----- Original Message ---- From: Adam Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >I really don't get what this has to do with LDAP authentication? Are >you going to store the documents themselves in LDAP?
That was the idea, yes. >Usually a >documentation repository will use LDAP accounts and LDAP groups/roles to >control access to content from the repository. I think LDAP itself >would make a pretty lousy documentation repository. Well, the docs are pretty small. Snippets, really. A couple of paragraphs, usually. Plus another field for URL, another for author, date, etc. In my case, there is no need for groups or roles. I will be the only one accessing and updating. If you think LDAP would be lousy for this, I could use MySQL, but it was my opinion MySQL would be lousy for this, since the data, once entered, will not be changed, and LDAP is faster. Furthermore, *some* database is necessary, since I have to manipulate the page based on the number of such documents. Your thoughts? TIA, Rachel > --- You are currently subscribed to ldap@umich.edu as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE as the SUBJECT of the message. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com --- You are currently subscribed to ldap@umich.edu as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE as the SUBJECT of the message.
