>>>>> Kurt Zeilenga <Kurt.Zeilenga...> writes:
[...]
> As an alternative approach, I would suggest having a single
> multi-valued attribute that would contain URIs expressing the
> location of the attribute. This would push various issues, such as
> which location system is being used, out to the URIs. This is a good
> thing as such issues are not unique to LDAP/X.500.
I've never heard of the geographic coordinates being encoded as
an URI. Could you please give any references on that matter (if
there're any)?
--
FSF associate member #7257
