> Hi,
> 
> >>e1000g1:
> flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4>
> mtu 1500 index 3
> >>        inet nnn.nnn.nnn.129 netmask fffffff8
> broadcast nnn.nnn.nnn.135
> >>        ether 0:21:28:1:5e:99
> 
> 
> plumb and configure the virtual switch vsw  instead
> of the physical 
> network in the primary ldom.
> 
> After doing this we often must stop the Guest LDom,
> unconfigure all 
> network adapters of the Guest LDom, reattach the
> network adapters to the 
> Guest LDom and start the Guest LDom again to make the
> virtual network 
> adapters work. And if you don't have installed the
> latest patches for 
> LDoms you must configure the virtual switch with the
> mac address of the 
> used physical network adapter.
> 

I gave this a try and it did not work, so I installed LDoms 1.0.3 but that did 
not help.

When I try to configure using a mac address i get the following error:

ifconfig vsw1 nnn.nnn.nnn.129  netmask 255.255.255.248 broadcast 
nnn.nnn.nnn.135 ether 0:21:28:1:5e:99
ifconfig: failed setting mac address on vsw1




Thanks
Glen













> 
> Be aware that the order of the "ldm add-vnet"
> commands define the order 
> of the network adapters in the Guest LDom
> 
> 
> HTH
> 
> Bernd
> 
> 
> Glen Gunselman wrote:
> > I have a working guest LDom on a T5220 with one
> network connection (we call this the management
> network, it's using e1000g0).  I need to add a second
> network connection (we are calling this the public
> network).
> >
> > 1.  ifconfig shows the physical interface is ready:
> >
> > ifconfig -a
> > ...
> > e1000g1:
> flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4>
> mtu 1500 index 3
> >         inet nnn.nnn.nnn.129 netmask fffffff8
> broadcast nnn.nnn.nnn.135
> >         ether 0:21:28:1:5e:99
> > ...
> >
> > 2.  I created the virtual switch
> >
> > ldm add-vsw net-dev=e1000g1 primary-vsw1 primary
> >
> > 3.  added the guest domain to the virtual network
> >
> > ldm add-vnet mac-addr=00:ff:00:ff:01:00  vnet2
> primary-vsw1 sweetumstest
> >
> > 4.  I did forget to do the reconfigure reboot of
> the control domain but have since done that.
> >
> > After booting the guest domain ifconfig shows vnet1
> is UP and RUNNING
> >
> > ifconfig -a
> > ...
> > vnet1:
> flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4>
> mtu 1500 index 3
> >         inet nnn.nnn.nnn.149 netmask fffffff8
> broadcast nnn.nnn.nnn.151
> >         ether 0:ff:0:ff:1:0
> > ...
> >
> > and traceroute picks vnet1 but fails:
> >
> > traceroute nnn.nnn.nnn.209
> > traceroute: Warning: Multiple interfaces found;
> using nnn.nnn.nnn.149 @ vnet1
> > traceroute to nnn.nnn.nnn.209 (nnn.nnn.nnn.209), 30
> hops max, 40 byte packets
> >
> > The same traceroute from the control domain
> succeeds using e1000g1.
> >
> > I'm no doubt over looking some simple thing but it
> escapes me today ... 
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Glen
> > --
> > This message posted from opensolaris.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > ldoms-discuss mailing list
> > ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org
> >
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ldoms-dis
> cuss
> >
> >   
> 
> 
> -- 
> Bernd Schemmer, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
> http://home.arcor.de/bnsmb/index.html
> 
> M s temprano que tarde el mundo cambiar .
>                         Fidel Castro
> ________________________
> ldoms-discuss mailing list
> ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ldoms-dis
> cuss
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org

Reply via email to