> On Mar 4, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Dmitriy Krayzman wrote:
> 
>> Do you know if this fix will be back ported to Solaris 10 U4 as a  
>> patch?
> 
> Not currently planned. If there is a escalation we can look into
> doing this. But current plan is to ask people to upgrade to U5.
> 
> -Narayan
> 

A patch won't be available until S10U5 ships but then you will be able to apply
the S10U5 Feature KU patch (127127-10) to machines running S10U4 and get the
LDoms functionality integrated into S10U5.

-- Liam



>> Thank you,
>> D.
>>
>> Narayan Venkat wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 4, 2008, at 4:14 PM, Dmitriy Krayzman wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>> I'm trying to use aggregated link (built with dladm) as my network
>>>> device attached to the virtual
>>>> switch but don't believe it's working. While configuration part  
>>>> works
>>>> without any errors,
>>>> jumpstarting guest domains fails. Replacing aggregated link with
>>>> simple interface e1000g0 works fine.
>>>>
>>>> Relevant info:
>>>> Solaris 10 U4
>>>> T5220
>>>> VSW
>>>>    NAME             MAC               NET-DEV   DEVICE     MODE
>>>>    primary-vsw0     00:14:4f:f8:f9:1d aggr1     switch at 0    
>>>> prog,promisc
>>>>
>>>> I found a bug 6531266 but status is fixed (assuming in Opensolaris).
>>> It is available in Nevada. I will be released as part of Solaris 10  
>>> U5.
>>>
>>>> Would it make sense to create two virtual switches attached to two
>>>> different physical interfaces and do link aggregation in a guest  
>>>> domain?
>>> That is not supported currently.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Narayan
>>>



Reply via email to