> On Mar 4, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Dmitriy Krayzman wrote: > >> Do you know if this fix will be back ported to Solaris 10 U4 as a >> patch? > > Not currently planned. If there is a escalation we can look into > doing this. But current plan is to ask people to upgrade to U5. > > -Narayan >
A patch won't be available until S10U5 ships but then you will be able to apply the S10U5 Feature KU patch (127127-10) to machines running S10U4 and get the LDoms functionality integrated into S10U5. -- Liam >> Thank you, >> D. >> >> Narayan Venkat wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> >>> On Mar 4, 2008, at 4:14 PM, Dmitriy Krayzman wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> I'm trying to use aggregated link (built with dladm) as my network >>>> device attached to the virtual >>>> switch but don't believe it's working. While configuration part >>>> works >>>> without any errors, >>>> jumpstarting guest domains fails. Replacing aggregated link with >>>> simple interface e1000g0 works fine. >>>> >>>> Relevant info: >>>> Solaris 10 U4 >>>> T5220 >>>> VSW >>>> NAME MAC NET-DEV DEVICE MODE >>>> primary-vsw0 00:14:4f:f8:f9:1d aggr1 switch at 0 >>>> prog,promisc >>>> >>>> I found a bug 6531266 but status is fixed (assuming in Opensolaris). >>> It is available in Nevada. I will be released as part of Solaris 10 >>> U5. >>> >>>> Would it make sense to create two virtual switches attached to two >>>> different physical interfaces and do link aggregation in a guest >>>> domain? >>> That is not supported currently. >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Narayan >>>
