NOFAILOVER does appear on the test address. alex.
Misha Chawla Shanker wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to setup IPMP in the guest ldom. Here is what I see in > "ifconfig -a" after attempting to set it up: > # ifconfig -a > lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu > 8232 index 1 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000 > vnet0: > flags=9040843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DEPRECATED,IPv4,NOFAILOVER> > mtu 1500 index 2 > inet 10.182.107.35 netmask fffff000 broadcast 10.182.111.255 > groupname production > ether 0:14:4f:fa:c6:13 > vnet0:1: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 2 > inet 10.182.107.37 netmask fffff000 broadcast 10.182.111.255 > vnet1: > flags=9040843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DEPRECATED,IPv4,NOFAILOVER> > mtu 1500 index 3 > inet 10.182.107.36 netmask fffff000 broadcast 10.182.111.255 > groupname production > ether 0:14:4f:f8:92:e0 > vnet1:1: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 index 3 > inet 10.182.107.38 netmask fffff000 broadcast 10.182.111.255 > > Is the NOFAILOVER expected to be set on vnet0 and vnet1 ? > > Regards, > Misha. > _______________________________________________ > ldoms-discuss mailing list > ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ldoms-discuss
