Hi, >>I would do just the opposite. Allow the service domain to cache the files, especially since an update to a file might be >>followed with another one,
And use directio in the Guest Domain? Enabling caching in the Control Domain and in the Guest Domains is not that useful I think. regards Bernd Steffen Weiberle wrote: > Bernd Schemmer wrote: >> What are the recommended mount options for filesystems with the image >> files for the (boot) disks of the guest LDOMS in the control LDOM? >> >> Currently we use forcedirectio,noatime,nologging - are these okay >> and/or are there other recommended options to improve the performance? > > I would do just the opposite. Allow the service domain to cache the > files, especially since an update to a file might be followed with > another one, and insure that if the service domain reboots, it reboots > as fast as possible and is not forced to possibly do a lengthly fsck. > > Steffen > >> How about using VxVM volumes for these filesystems - anything to >> consider here? >> >> I could not find anything about this issue in the documentation. >> >> regards >> >> Bernd >> -- >> This message was posted from opensolaris.org >> _______________________________________________ >> ldoms-discuss mailing list >> ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ldoms-discuss > -- Bernd Schemmer, Frankfurt am Main, Germany http://home.arcor.de/bnsmb/index.html M s temprano que tarde el mundo cambiar . Fidel Castro
