Steffen Weiberle wrote:
> Maciej Browarski wrote:
>   
>> Hello,
>> Is possible that  OS GUEST  can  run  independently of OS HOST ?
>> because I saw that when my OS HOST crashed and after reboot I see that 
>> OS GUEST has normal Uptime.
>> What conditions must occur  to  have OS GUEST  indepent of OS HOST ?
>>  
>> Regards  
>>
>>     
>
> Not sure if I understand the question, and i'll try to answer what I 
> think it is.
>
> With LDom later than 1.0.0, if the service domain goes down, the guest 
> LDoms stay running but can't use the downed service domain's I/O. If 
> there are two service domains configured, and the second is running, and 
> the guest is (or guests are) configured to fail over I/O, they will not 
> only continue to run, but also continue to have access to the outside world.
>
> I don't know how long a guest can stay running with its boot device not 
> accessible. I can't think of a way to test this with only one service 
> domain, since you will loose access to the guest's console as well.
>
> I ran a quick test. Using 1.0.2 (which is not available yet) and Solaris 
> 10 update 5 build 10 in both the service and guest LDoms. A ping to the 
> guest failed for about a minute, and started up again early during the 
> reboot of the service domain. An ssh session stayed up.
>
> mtllab150 is the guest LDom. I did an 'init 6' in the service LDom.
>
> 11 bytes from mtllab150 (10.1.14.150): icmp_seq=7.
> 11 bytes from mtllab150 (10.1.14.150): icmp_seq=8.
> 11 bytes from mtllab150 (10.1.14.150): icmp_seq=9.
> 11 bytes from mtllab150 (10.1.14.150): icmp_seq=65.
> 11 bytes from mtllab150 (10.1.14.150): icmp_seq=66.
> 11 bytes from mtllab150 (10.1.14.150): icmp_seq=67.
>
> Steffen
>
> _______________________________________________
> ldoms-discuss mailing list
> ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ldoms-discuss
>   
Thanks for reply,
So, if I can configure  guest  LDOMS to use direct hdd and network there 
is chance that these LDOMS will be independent  from  service domain 
ldoms. But  question is:
Can I use  direct access to hardware without service domain like in 
Dynamic Domains ?
Now I use nv_85 with LDOMS 1.0.2 

Regards
Maciej


Reply via email to