On 10/30/07, Octave Orgeron <unixconsole at yahoo.com> wrote: > Agreed. The config from 5.1 is the simplest and works well. The
What happens if you have several LDOMs on a single machine configured for active(vnet0)/standby(vnet1) and vsw0 in the service ldom loses link? It seems to me that IPMP could be pinging IP addresses that are on other LDOMs on the same physical box and as such all of the LDOMs could be isolated from the network but none of them would detect it. As such, even though the standby interface is available and working, all of the LDOMs would be invisible to any devices outside of the single box. I think that this situation could be highly likely on private subnets that do not have a default route. > The big issue is that both 5.1 and 5.2 consume additional IP's due > to the fact that link status is not propagated up through the VSW's. > If this were corrected, it would make option 5.1 highly effective. Having the link state propogated would be highly desirable. Are there technical limitations that prevent this or has it just not been implemented yet? -- Mike Gerdts http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/
