On Mar 8, 2010, at 11:21 PM, Brian Kolaci wrote: > > On 3/8/2010 6:18 PM, Rob Farr wrote: >> Hi, >> >> No performance advantage and you use up another LDC.
Each vdisk-vdsdev connection consumes an LDC, regardless of whether those vdsdev's are exported by one or a set of vds devices. -Eric > > So is there a limitation to the number of LDC's you can allocat > If so, then that's probably a good enough reason to avoid that as a best > practice. > >> >> The only possible advantage I can think of is if the vds hung >> due to some unknown bug. Then *maybe* the other vds would be ok. >> >> Rob >>> >>> Are there any advantages or disadvantages to having multiple disk >>> devices? >>> >>> For example, typically people just create one vds, i.e. primary-vds0. >>> >>> Is there any benefit to having one per guest LDom, or even one per-disk? >>> >>> One SA at a client was creating one per disk, per LDom, for example: >>> >>> ldom1-vol0 - root disk0 >>> ldom1-data-vol0 - app data disk 1 >>> ldom1-data-vol2 - app data disk 2 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Brian >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ldoms-discuss mailing list >>> ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ldoms-discuss >> > > _______________________________________________ > ldoms-discuss mailing list > ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ldoms-discuss -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2425 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ldoms-discuss/attachments/20100309/fb0c2746/attachment.bin>
