On 03/04/2011 14:30, Julien Gabel wrote:
Hi,

I think the T3-4 server has it's internal disks split across 2 controllers, so you
can have dual i/o domains without having a external storage for the boot disks.
At least I hope so, we have some on order :)

      
Correct.  It is the only one of the T3 based servers to have this feature.
OK, it is clear from the Oracle's SPARC T3-4 server motherboard design found
on page 28 of the "Oracle's SPARC T3-1, SPARC T3-2, SPARC T3-4 and
SPARC T3-1B Server Architecture" white paper that 4 SAS HDD are addressed
by the PCIe Switch 0, and the other 4 SAS HDD are addressed by the PCIe
Switch 3.

But on the same white paper, the Oracle's SPARC T3-1 server motherboard
design found on page 22 suggests that up to 16 SAS HDD are addressed by
the PCIe Switch 0, and by the PCIe Switch 1 through 2 SAS Controllers, but
interconnected to a single SAS/SATA Expander.  I am not sure about the
interpretation of the 8 other SAS HDD on the bottom left.  Do you think that
the T3-1 permit us to have 2 I/O domains with only internal storage as for the
T3-4 ?

No because there is only a single PCI bus in a single socket and this cannot be split.

The disks are indeed across two switches, but these are in fact in an active/passive configuration, in that only one switch can conteol the disks ats any one time.

T

--
julien.
http://blog.thilelli.net/


--


Terry Smith | Principal Sales Consultant
Phone: +44 118 924 000 | Mobile: +44 7802212151
Oracle UK & Ireland Hardware Systems Sales
Oracle Parkway | Thames Valley Park | Reading | RG6 1RA | United Kingdom


ORACLE Corporation UK Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales | Company Reg. No. 1782505 | Reg. office: Oracle Parkway, Thames Valley Park, Reading RG6 1RA
Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment


Oracle
                Server & Storage Systems
_______________________________________________
ldoms-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ldoms-discuss

Reply via email to