Pat,

Desiring development conferences should not be a surprise.

In the private sector, that is a major source of revenue to the people that put them on and a major social event for those in their respective discipline. I don't personally find them all that educational for the money spent, but it is a valuable source of networking for developers and businesses, as well as an occasion where numerous topics are presented, discussed and debated - so there is merit at several levels.

Logistically, I would expect that any type of conference would not be forthcoming until the Church has matured a bit in terms of it's relationship with OSS developers
at large and the number of stable efforts underway.

However, I can see mini-conferences taking place at established venues, such as Genealogical conferences and other Church sponsored forae, where it makes sense
to do so.

With the API venue, it would make sense that the Church provide the gold source repository for such an effort and make use of existing distribution outlets, such as SourceForge, etc. so there is an audit path to the code and it doesn't fork and fracture like many projects do when there is little control on source distribution from
the top.

I do agree with you about the mailing lists and the Wiki as a community effort.

...Paul

pat eyler wrote:
I have to admit to being surprised at the results on question 16:
From 1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest, please rate which
services you feel the Church should provide through a sponsorship
to the LDS development community?

Some of the answers make sense, but baffled by one of them:
Forum software        2.64
Wiki        3.33
Source code repository    3.80
Mailing lists        3.53
Provide APIs to data provided by the Church    4.69
Development conferences        2.74
News letters    3.00


APIs make sense to sit up at the top, but Wikis and to a lesser
degree newsletters and source code repositories are easy to
set up and host, but a conference is something that would be
hard to put together, advertise, and pull of without some kind
of sponsorship.

From a pragmatic perspective, it seems like the church is much
more capable of doing two things than anyone else:  providing
APIs and hosting/sponsoring conferences -- anything else
would be nice, but could be handled by the community.


_______________________________________________
Ldsoss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss

Reply via email to