On Tuesday 15 May 2007 12:56:05 pm David Hale wrote:
> It may just be my gut feel, but I would probably only use Derby for
> a "development" database rather than to depend on it for a "production"
> environment.
My current project (at work) is using embedded Derby for production work, and
has been for two years now, with a few thousand users. The Derby DB is more
of a thick-client local cache of a subset of the real DB (which is DB/2), but
those embedded databases are managing hundreds of megs of data and we've
never seen a single DB-related issue.
Shawn.
_______________________________________________
Ldsoss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss
