On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 11:43, John Klar wrote: > Just some observations about my interpretation of the GPL. Perhaps they > won't be terribly popular, but hopefully it'll make a few people *think*. > > [2] Pointing requestors to the upstream source is NOT good enough. The > distributor is required to provide the sources THEY use.
John, Would this apply to our packages (.lrp) also? If so, nearly all of our packages are non-compliant. If I recall correctly, source of packages only compiled (not modified) by us (LEAF) or the Linux Router Project were always pointed upstream. I think Mathew Grant was the only one to include package source along with .lrp packages he produced. If this describes the situation correctly, it gives us even more incentive to migrate to a ports/gento based system for our .lrp packages. -- Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
