Hi David At 08:48 21/08/02 -0500, David Douthitt wrote: >I've decided I need to revisit the LEAF Developer's Guide, >and want to know what I need to do to make it ready for >this "DocBook" format.
I've been working on converting your Developers' Guide to Docbook for a while now. I've got a Docbook version just about finished I think, but I've been having trouble working out the finer details of converting it to html, pdf etc. I emailed you on 12 July not long after I started this work but it seems you didn't get the message. I spotted a few errors that I made in the conversion that I'd like to sort out first, but I could email you the xml document in the next day or two if you'd like? >Side Note: Under the GFDL, PDF and PostScript are Opaque formats, >and HTML and Text are Transparent. Does this affect anything? I shouldn't have thought so. I haven't read the relevant license, but I suppose that as long as the transparent formats are available, it wouldn't violate any bit of the licence if the opaque formats were made available already. >I see that DocBook (v3.1) exists for Red Hat 6.2; will this >be sufficient? Do I have to upgrade? Will new versions work >on Red Hat 6.2? I'm sure they will - it will generally be a case of getting together new sets of DTD's and stylesheets, rather than compiling new tools. At the moment Docbook v4.1.2 is probably the one to go for, because it's XML-based rather than SGML, which is where Docbook is going apparently. cheers Julian -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ljchurch.co.uk ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
