Am Dienstag, 15. März 2016, 17:32:55 schrieb Erich Titl: > Hi KP > > Am 15.03.2016 um 17:28 schrieb kp kirchdoerfer: > > Hi Erich; > > ... > > > Just to be clear I don't argue against a seperate WRAP image, until it's > > proofed to be outdated by download stats. > > But I'm questioning seperate images for ALIX and Geode. > > That is fine. But then I _believe_ the geodes all use the same PATA > companion chips, so we might really restrict them there too. Seeing the > difference in size, it hardly matters. I just don't like to include dead > code.
Ok, your decision, which may be valid until proofed wrong; But why choose a naming after a specific device (Alix) instead of keeping a ore generic naming? I'd prefer to go with geode, though with a shrinked kernel config as you proposed, and if needed we can enhance... kp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
