<x-flowed>At 08:58 PM 12/5/00 -0800, Steven Peck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>One site page.
>
>Managing one set of pages for info is work enough, but on a volunteer
>basis is hard enough. Supporting multiple browsers on a volunteer project
>is a formula for burn out and burn out is bad. 'Sides, if it's a straight
>forward site, day to day maintenence can be distributed amoung sections.
Steven,
Agreed, but it may not be possible. Cocoon would help here.
>The problem is going for the Least Common Denominater(LCD).
>I hadn't though of trying for the page design, but I just might now, time
>permitting :(.
I look forward to seeing your entry. :)
>For instance, LCD Screen size width choices 640 800 1024 pixels wide?
>Check out www.sierrafoothill.org (site I support on a volunteer basis,
>still have stuff to add) It's set for a 640 wide screen -actually 610 so
>the up/down scroll bar will fit on the screen up/down scroll bar good
>left/right scrollbar BAD! 'course the audience for Sierra Foothill is not
>techie. With techies we could probably go for 800 to 1024 width. I vote
>for the 800 wide as I like to see what's in the background as I work on my
>reasearch. Tables that arn't hard set cause difficulties with Netscape 4
>versions and can do really funky things.
I'd like to use %, and try to be resolution independent. That reminds me, I
need to fix the left menu for my entry.
>Browsers -
> I'd set Netscape 4.07 and ie 5.0 as the least common denominators, I for
> one don't bother to test anything lower than that. I have enough crap on
> my system as it is and I'm not about to reload more if I don't have to. :)
Did you mean Netscape 4.7? Also, we need to add lynx and Mozilla to the list.
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel
</x-flowed>
