<x-flowed>At 12:22 PM 1/13/01 -0600, "Charles Steinkuehler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Charles,
> > I'd prefer quick. We can fix things later. Also, we may want to
> > change the SF structure later anyway. A lot depends on what
> > actually works. Theory is great, but until we start integrating
> > things we wont know what the problems with the current structure
> > are.
>
>I'll try to get content uploaded this weekend, maybe even today.
Great. :)
>Right now, I'm doing an emergency web-server install at our SanFrancisco
>location, which has some spare bandwidth.
>
>Check out:
>
>http://www.newtek.com
>
>to test your patience. Put yourself in the 'saint' catagory if you let
>the entire page load, and that's just the splash screen.
I guess I'm in that category. The page loaded in about 45sec. Just for
kicks I clicked on the invisible logo (Netscape rendering problem), and the
main page loaded in about the same amount of time. Of course, junkbuster
prevented the three banners from loading. ;)
>This is what happens when you co-lo a web server requiring high bandwidth
>with 18 other server machines, all sharing the same T1. Of course, the
>price was pretty low...
>
>NOTE: I warned of exactly this result prior to installing the server
>on-site, but as usual, no-one listens until after the fact...
Do they ever want to hear bad news up front?
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
</x-flowed>
