I don't get it, what makes rinetd different from 'ipportfw/ipautofw' or
'ipmasqdm portfw/autofw'???

is a deamon process any better than a kernel process?

pedro

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Douthitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 2:33 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] rinetd - a TCP port redirector
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 21 Jan 2001, at 18:19, Mike Noyes wrote:
> 
> > Is rinted usefull?
> > 
> > >Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 13:12:22 -0800
> > >From: John Wenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: Linux Router Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Subject: [LRP] rinetd - a TCP port redirector: High 
> Performance Holes 
> > >through Firewalls for Internal Servers
> 
> It was probably quite useful with Linux 2.0, but not with Linux 2.2 
> with ipmasqadm:
> 
> # ipmasqadm portfw -h
> Usage: portfw -a -P PROTO -L LADDR LPORT -R RADDR RPORT 
> [-p PREF] add entry
>        portfw -d -P PROTO -L LADDR LPORT [-R RADDR RPORT]    
>      delete entry
>        portfw -f                                              
>     clear table
>        portfw -l                                              
>     list table
>        portfw <args> -n                                       
>     no names
> 
> PROTO is the protocol, can be "tcp" or "udp"
> LADDR is the local interface receiving packets to be forwarded.
> LPORT is the port being redirected.
> RADDR is the remote address.
> RPORT is the port being redirected to.
> PREF  is the preference level (load balancing, default=10)
> #
> 
> However, the general principle has proved to be quite useful here: 
> recently replaced an overpowered and potentially insecure firewall 
> system (full Red Hat install) with a simpler and smaller system 
> (Oxygen).  The security gains were tremendous, but now the 
> former "servers" located on the firewall system are behind the 
> firewall - so I just port-forward to the old system.  Nice.
> 
> -- 
> David Douthitt
> UNIX Systems Administrator
> HP-UX, Linux, Unixware
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leaf-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
> 

_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to