mike, this mail you just sent took under 7 mins, so it's a normal en route
time.
I've also spotted a minor glitch on the smtp headers:
List-Archive: <http://lists.sourceforge.net/archives//leaf-devel/>
^^
explorer doesn't care and displays it ok.... forget explanations, its just a
little glitch!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 4:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] linux-router list down?
>
>
> At 12:19 PM 1/24/01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 01:42:50PM -0800, Mike Noyes scribbled:
> > > Everyone,
> > > It looks like the linux-router list is down. If you need
> to discuss
> > > "user" topics the leaf-user list is available. Has Dave C. been
> > > notified that something is wrong with the linux-router list?
> >
> > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 23
> 22:22:54 2001
> >Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:42:50 -0800
> >
> >What it looks like is that it took a damn long time for this
> >message to reach me. Did everybody else just get this messge too?
>
> Rick,
> No, I received that message almost immediately after I sent
> it. There is a
> known qrunner problem with Mailman 2.0 that is fixed in
> 2.0.1, but I'm not
> sure if it would cause delayed deliveries though. SourceForge hasn't
> updated or patched to the current version as far as I know. ref.
> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/ \
> 2001-January/008861.html
>
> Rick, it may be your address. Has anyone else noticed delayed
> delivery of
> list posts?
>
> --
> Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leaf-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
