On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 07:10:04AM -0800, Mike Noyes scribbled:
> > Pedro,
> > Ok, I'm sorry I didn't phrase that question better. You're leaning towards 
> > multiple listings, correct?
> 
> That makes two of us. Not only might one user look under 'firewalls'
> because that's the only keyword he knows, where a power user looking
> for flexibility might look under 'network utilities'; but also, it's
> always difficult to navigate directories like that correctly -- so,
> somebody might try a few branches and find something like 'embedded'
> or 'firewall' or 'network utilities' before he finds the others, and
> each user finds a different one first, and often doesn't find any of
> the others.
> 

Good point -- I personally never try to browse my way to a goal, but
rather use the search engine. Don't know if that's common or not, but if
it's common then we can stick the listing anywhere...

> > ><snip>
> > >so, what I want to say is that LEAF is a 'system' that can do many things 
> > >around the routing issue, and it can serve several purposes, why not use 
> > >that feature to make it known to all?
> > 
> > This makes sense, but how do we resolve the single listing requirement of 
> > the Open Directory project?
> 

How about LEAF/Oxygen, LEAF/Eigerstein, LEAF/royal-king-elmo (squeaks "Oh 
nooo!!! Let's sing the hacker song!!!!" every time psentry goes off),
&c...

> You know my suggestion...since LEAF isn't a single 'product', not
> a one-trick pony, LEAFs can get categorized and each category has
> a page under leaf.sourceforge.net/categoryname/; then each of the
> categories has a listing in OpenDir.
> 
> > --
> > Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
> 


_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to