From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Wolzak)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] RE: [LRP] Kernel 2.4.x and IPTables
Priority: normal
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe>
Date sent: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 16:04:05 +0100
> forwardet to the list, I forgot at the primary post.
>
> > Hello a late reaction :=)
> > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Hilton Travis wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi George,
> > > >
> > > > I downloaded your 2.4.1 1.68MB image and stuck it on a disk. I just
> > > > un-commented the following modules (and added the 3c509.0 module from
> > > > your kernel tarball to the disk):
> > > >
> > > > iptable_nat ip_nat_ftp
> > > > ip_conntrack ip_conntrack_ftp
> > > > ipt_LOG ipt_mac
> > > > ipt_state (all exist in the original downloaded image)
> > > >
> > ip_tables is missing, unless it is compiled into the kernel.
> >
> > ipt_state, ipt_limit, ipt_MASQUERADE, ipt_REDIRECT,
> > ipt_REJECT, ipt_LOG, iptable_mangle, iptable_Filter and
> > iptable_NAT
> >
> > ipt_MASQUERADE, and ipt_REDIRECT depend on iptable_NAT
> > which depend on ip_tables and ip_conntrack.
> >
> > Hope this helps.
> >
> > > > and am receiving the following errors upon boot:
> > >
> > > Oh, bugger all. I was worried about something like that.
> > >
> > > It's possible that the patches horked something - I haven't actually tried
> > > to use any of the IPTables stuff, even on a full-blown system - so I
> > > couldn't say either.
> > >
> > > If anyone has any ideas, let me know. I just do the compiles; I'm by no
> > > means a kernel hacker. I'll leave the info in so that it gets around.
> > >
> >
> >
> > > > ip_conntrack_ftp - ip_nat_ftp - /lib/modules/ip_nat_ftp.o:
> > > > unresolved symbol ip_nat_expect_register
> > > >
> > > > /lib/modules/ip_nat_ftp.o: unresolved symbol
> > > > ip_nat_helper_register
> > > > /lib/modules/ip_nat_ftp.o: unresolved symbol
> > > > ip_nat_helper_unregister
> > > > /lib/modules/ip_nat_ftp.o: unresolved symbol
> > > > ip_nat_expect_unregister
> > > > /lib/modules/ip_nat_ftp.o: unresolved symbol
> > > > ip_nat_cheat_check
> > > > /lib/modules/ip_nat_ftp.o: unresolved symbol
> > > > ip_nat_setup_info
> > > >
> > > > /lib/modules/ipt_LOG.o: unresolved symbol
> > > > ipt_register_target_Rc2629570
> > > > /lib/modules/ipt_LOG.o: unresolved symbol
> > > > ipt_unregister_target_Rd09de455
> > > >
> > > > /lib/modules/ipt_mac.o: unresolved symbol
> > > > ipt_register_match_Ra8f99fa5
> > > > /lib/modules/ipt_mac.o: unresolved symbol
> > > > ipt_unregister_match_R47dc74f4
> > > >
> > > > /lib/modules/ipt_state.o: unresolved symbol
> > > > ipt_register_match_Ra8f99fa5
> > > > /lib/modules/ipt_state.o: unresolved symbol
> > > > ipt_unregister_match_R47dc74f4
> > > >
> > > > /lib/modules/iptable_nat.o: unresolved symbol
> > > > ipt_register_target_Rc2629570
> > > > /lib/modules/iptable_nat.o: unresolved symbol
> > > > ipt_do_table_R5f4c29b0
> > > > /lib/modules/iptable_nat.o: unresolved symbol
> > > > ipt_register_table_Rac1c54e9
> > > > /lib/modules/iptable_nat.o: unresolved symbol
> > > > ipt_unregister_target_Rd09de455
> > > > /lib/modules/iptable_nat.o: unresolved symbol
> > > > ipt_unregister_table_R9b146f17
> > > >
> > > > I assume there is some issue with the kernel compile itself - looks like
> > > > something (1) was left out that should have been left in. Maybe.
> > > >
> > > > I really want to have a play with the new kernel and iptables to see
> > > > what I can come up with, but unfortunately do not have another working
> > > > Linux box here at present on which I can try a kernel compile myself.
> > > >
> > > > Anyway, when you get your 2.4.2 kernel and associated files uploaded
> > > > I'll be downloading and trying these out. All the best.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Hilton
> > > >
> > > > (1) Buggers me what tho
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Leaf-devel mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > George Metz
> > > Commercial Routing Engineer
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > "We know what deterrence was with 'mutually assured destruction' during
> > > the Cold War. But what is deterrence in information warfare?" -- Brigadier
> > > General Douglas Richardson, USAF, Commander - Space Warfare Center
> > >
> > Eric Wolzak
> >
> > Leaf.sourceforge.net/ericw/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leaf-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
