<x-flowed>Pim van Riezen, 2001-03-18 16:54 +0100
>In conclusion, at first glance I don't think it will be easy to "fold" the
>CISH project inside LEAF. Nor do I think it'd be wise to do it the other
>way around.
Pim,
CISH wouldn't "fold" into LEAF in the way you're thinking. EigerStein,
Oxygen, and soon Ladybug are LRP derivatives supported by our project. They
remain independent of each other. CISH would become an additional LRP
derivative that we support. Our support for LRP derivatives is stated in
the first two sentences of our stated goals.
~ Create an inclusive environment for current developers of the Linux
~ Router Project to release their modifications to the public. Support
~ continued development of Linux Router Project derived LEAF images and
~ packages.
> From what we _could_ benefit is mindshare and a common direction with
> regards to things like package formats and kernel architecture.
This is part of what the LEAF project is for. We also reduce the amount of
redundant work necessary to support individual release documentation, web
site maintenance, and various admin work. In addition, SourceForge provides
bandwidth, and many other useful services.
>I just now subscribed myself to leaf-devel, I Cc:ed the list as an
>introductionary and after that I will first shut up for a bit and see
>what's going on :).
Welcome aboard. I hope you find this list helpful. :)
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
</x-flowed>
