> > I propose the following:
> >
> > 1) EigerStein2Beta is upgraded with a current weblet.lrp and
dhclient.lrp,
> > released as EigerStein2 (non-beta), and left at that.
>
> I propose that EigerStein2 have its binaries upgraded - most of them
> should be available in Oxygen, and upgrading wouldn't be that hard.....
> would it?
Not a bad idea...just has to get done <sigh>
> > The new disk images could be the first LEAF releases, or could be called
> > something else entirely.
>
> I didn't think LEAF would have "releases" ....
I was never clear on exactly how this was going to be handled, but
regardless, I'd like to see more than one person chipping in to help with
the distribution, hopefully enabling the large number of registerd leaf
developers to use the SF infrastructure to collaberate easily, getting away
from one-man-bands, which tend to be a problem if the one individual becomes
busy or dissappears for a while.
> > I'd like to avoid using EigerStein to prevent any
> > confusion with the existing Eiger based distributions.
>
> Hmmmm.... Kilimanjaro?
Not a good choice, as that was the first version released by Matthew Grant
(although I don't think it made it into wide circulation), although I think
the way the current SF site is structured, EigerStein 3 would probably be
most appropriate if it's not a LEAF 1.0 release. I just never thought of
EigerStein as a 'true' distribution (more a collection of stuff that works
together...wait, is that a distribution? :), and I think keeping the Eiger
in the title would probably just piss off Dave C., who seems to be kind of
sensitive about Matthew's disto's...
Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
