On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 04:45:59PM -0500, David Douthitt scribbled:
> As for a LEAF distribution, I think I would actually shy away from an
> actual "LEAF" image; the concept is good but the literal
> implementation would be bad. Put another way, I wouldn't have any
> problem with "Maple LRP" created by the LEAF project (as one more LEAF
> variant) but to have a "LEAF LRP" or "LEAF image" would overshadow
> projects like Eigerstein and Oxygen. Oxygen, among being good for
> others to use, reflects my own decisions and foibles - I like it that
> way :-)
>
> A LEAF LRP would cause people to think that Oxygen has been superceded
> by LEAF, or that LEAF is "more current" or "better" which may or may
> not be true.
Absolutely correct. Somebody who is completely unfamiliar with
any of it, who goes to the LEAF project and has to choose between
LEAF and Oxygen, will look at [and choose] LEAF first.
--
rick -- A mind is like a parachute... it only works when it's open.
ICQ# 1590117 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help with LRP: http://lrp.c0wz.com Home page: http://www.c0wz.com
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
