Charles Steinkuehler, 2001-04-19 16:13 -0500
>Well, I've checked the shell-script web-sever, sh-httpd into CVS. Looks
>like I'm the first to put something into CVS other than the website...
>I'm almost giddy over how cool it is to use CVS, and how easy it is to
>create new directories.
Charles,
Yeah, it's a piece of cake when you get the basics down. :)
>I suggest we begin checking in other shell-scripts, like linuxrc,
>POSIXness, the backup-scripts/apkg, etc. into CVS as well. Has anyone
>given any thought to how the CVS archive should be structured? Should we
>have seperate directories for different functions (ie linuxrc vs.
>POSIXness), and should different distributions (LRP, Oxygen, EigerStein)
>be seperate CVS trees, or just seperate branches?
I'm for separate trees. It allows more flexibility to the release lead
developer. Although, branches are better if everyone wants to work from the
same base.
>I think we should try to keep the various distributions in the same tree
>(though likely as seperate branches...this should help with propogating
>updates from one branch to another), and possibly have seperate trees for
>the major functions (ie sh-httpd, and POSIXness are clearly their own
>trees...how to handle the lrcfg scripts, linuxrc, etc... is a bit trickier).
>
>NOTE TO WEB GURU's: I think SF changed the web-based CVS front-end.
Fixed.
>And that's it!
>
>Checkout the SF Docs for more details:
>http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=763&group_id=1
Other good CVS documentation:
http://www.cvshome.org/docs/blandy.html
http://cvsbook.red-bean.com/cvsbook.html
http://www.cvshome.org/docs/manual/cvs.html
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
