On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Mike Noyes wrote: > David Douthitt, 2001-04-20 16:25 -0500 > >I like the long name idea, using VFAT. The only thing is, VFAT adds > >FAT to the kernel (pun intended :-) Just how big is this thing? > > Would someone explain to me why we shouldn't use cramfs? I believe it works > with floppies too. This is designed to remain mounted indefinitely, which is appropriate for flashram, but I feel this is inappropriate for the floppy. > http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT5214244852.html > ~ Together, Quinlan reckons that cramfs, ramfs and packramfs comprise an > ~ "elegant" solution for embedded developers wishing to optimize boot > ~ time, resource usage and robustness. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jeff Newmiller The ..... ..... Go Live... DCN:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go... Work:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing Research Engineer (Solar/Batteries O.O#. #.O#. with /Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...2k --------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
