Arne Bernin wrote:
>What is missing right now is thread support. That's for sure ;-)
>
I don't have anthing to add to Pim's post.
>>>but seems to go right into that
>>>direction, and if it supports enough functions/binaries i would vote for that.
>>>It is small and is good supported, although it may not be possible to
>>>compile every program,
>>>
>>Anything using ipv6 comes to my mind, am I right?
>>
>
>Well i'm not sure. But if this is the case i'm sure they are working on
>it...
>
I was considering asking about that on the uClibc list. I think you're
right we can expect ipv6. I'm pretty sure lineo has some clients that
(will, in the future) want it.
>>>but as more people seem to use this for their
>>>embedded systems more programs that are really needed for
>>>routing/scripting/firewalling should work than.
>>>
>>>So maybe in half a year it gets really usable.
>>>
>>>So what do you think (or did you already discuss this and i missed it ???)
>>>
>>>
>>I''d love to work on this. Actually I already planned to make a
>>proof-of-concept version of some LRP distro based on uClibc.
>>
>
>Well maybe we can talk about that ;-)
>
OK, if you want to, contact me by private email.
>
>The Maintainer of busybox/tinylogin/uClibc seems to be willing to help get
>things running if you run into trouble.
>But as i said it might take some time, as they haven't even released one
>version yet (Only CVS)..
>
I know. I have been keeping an eye on the shared library/libdl stuff
lately (which afaik works now). Oh, and I did say proof-of-concept,
didn't I?
Ewald Wasscher
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
