Charles Steinkuehler wrote:

> In light of my recent decision to abandon waiting for Butterfly, I am taking
> a long, hard look at working with Monta-Vista's Hard-Hat linux.

> Another benefit of using something like HardHat is multi-processor support.

> NOTE:  I'm still very open to suggestions on what to use as the base of the
> next generation of LRP like functionality.  I'm mainly looking at starting
> with an existing distribution because 'out of the box' you get a working
> cross-compile environment (no more dedicated Debian Slink boxes just to
> compile an application or two), and much of the software will be
> pre-packaged.

I suppose it depends on what you want to do.  However, this sounds
like you want to switch distributions entirely; isn't this the same as
starting from scratch?

> While the pre-packaged stuff will likely be in RPM format, it
> should be possible to easily convert the RPM's to a tar.gz file or something
> else shell-scripts can deal with.

Busybox already has support for undoing RPMs (unrpm); use that.

> A lot of the hard work (that requires
> maintainence and debugging) goes into making sure the packages all work well
> together...we should be able to leverage this work from a mainstream
> distribution and speed our "time to solution".  I really don't want to try
> to create or maintain a complete, from the ground up distribution...it seems
> like too much duplication of existing work.

This sounds like you are looking to go to "the next step" and leave
floppy distributions and LRP far behind.  There are quite a few
CDROM-based routers out there.  Peanut perhaps...

I'd like to stay with the current base for several reasons:

* Existing package support
* Knowledge base is built up already; otherwise Charles & Mike S. &
Mike N. & Jacques & Jeff & Ray & Rick & Ewald & Pi et al ....would
have to learn a new distro.
* Floppy-based operations is still important - to me, the floppy
should still be the base, and in fact should be a drop-in install for
a bootable CDROM floppy image.

However, a shift towards RPMs would be nice.

_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to