I think Charles' POV is a good one. If we know most of
the core requirements of LEAF (eg, floppy-based, BusyBox, uLibC,
.deb and .rpm support, easy cross-compiling, etc) it shouldn't
be too hard to roll our own distro, and specify our own development
platform as *seperate* things. I don't even think it be a bad
idea. :)
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
- [Leaf-devel] New Development Platform? David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] New Development Platform? Scott C. Best
- Re: [Leaf-devel] New Development Platform? Charles Steinkuehler
- RE: [Leaf-devel] New Development Platform? Steven Peck
- Re: [Leaf-devel] New Development Platform? David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] New Development Platform? Charles Steinkuehler
- Re: [Leaf-devel] New Development Platform? Jack Coates
- Re: [Leaf-devel] New Development Platform? David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] New Development Platform? Pim van Riezen
