> > Also, I'm generally interested in 'really thin' servers. The first will
> > probably be a BIND server, which I'd also like to see install straight
from
> > the CD.
> >
> > Charles Steinkuehler
> Hi Charles !
> What are the reasons which make you choose Bind over tinydns if you are
> looking for a "really thin" server ? Tinydns is really compact (package
size=
> 23K plus 45K for dnscache) and very efficient and secure.
> Jacques
Tinydns is an excellent option, and very suited to the LRP/LEAF environment.
However, there are a LOT of systems out there running Bind, and a lot of
sysadmins that are familiar with setting up and administering Bind, yet
worried about potential security problems...this is the target 'market' for
a very thin Bind platform.
It would also be quite possible to build exactly the same sort of system
using Tinydns, and I would expect this to happen as well, but Tinydns
doesn't benifit as much from the restricted environment, being more secure
and less complex to start with.
Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
