On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, David Douthitt wrote: > Perhaps LEAF can adopt the Debian classification system (free and > non-free, etc.) and classify packages that way? I would be interested in seeing an LRP package repositry, similar to say CPAN in format, with version information and so on. At the momment, it is a little chaotic. It would require cooperation on the part of the lrp submiters. There could be an 'other' directory for unclassified lrps. Maybe information in the lrp package information files could contain this (author, version) etc... and it would eb automated. Or is this one step away from RPM and DEB? :-) Dale. _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Jacques Nilo
- RE: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Andrew Hoying
- RE: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Mike Noyes
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Charles Steinkuehler
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) David Douthitt
- [Leaf-devel] New...Kernel 2.4.5 with Oxygen May ... Andrew Hoying
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Andrew Hoying
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) jdnewmil
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Dale Long
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Jack Coates
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Dale Long
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Jack Coates
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Andrew Hoying
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Dale Long
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Mike Noyes
