KP Kirchdörfer wrote:

> > I think ntp4 would be overkill, especially as it's not designed for
> > dialup connections.  However, packaging ntpdate would be useful I
> > think.
> 
> I might be wrong, but it seems nptdate provides only the client side - I'm
> interested to have the router providing timeservice to the lan - given the
> current setup, that it is permanently connected to the net.

You misunderstand - rdate (and ntpdate) are only useful in the booting
up process.  Once ntpdate has run, then xntpd should be run right
after.  In fact, this is standard operation: first run ntpdate, then run
xntpd.  The reason is that if your system is far enough off, xntpd will
not adjust the clock.  ntpdate, however, just like rdate, will set the
clock immediately no matter what the current time the system thinks it
is.

> I'm more concerned if future kernels and the move to glibc 2.1.3 will still
> allow a  _valuable_ floppy distro.

So far, it appears so.  Oxygen (development) is already using glibc
2.1.3 on a floppy, and someone has converted Oxygen to use 2.4. 
However, this may not always be the case...

_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to