Correction: my bad . . .

"Michael D. Schleif" wrote:
> 
> Voilą!
> 
> Serge Caron wrote:
> >
> > >Let me reduce my confusion to its firstmost problem: How does your sed
> > >process facilitate ``*I don't backup program binaries*''?
> > >
> > >AFAIK, ${pkg}.list files -- _minus_ ${pkg}.exclude.list files -- define
> > >which files comprise the ${pkg} package -- correct?
> > >
> > >Once you eliminate all files under etc, /etc and ./etc from ${pkg}.list
> > >files, what you have left is ``a bunch of binaries'' -- am I wrong?
> > >
> > >Wouldn't you reach this same end if all files under etc, /etc and ./etc
> > >were only listed in ${pkg}.exclude.list files?
> > >
> > >Until I fully understand this premise of yours, I do not know how to
> > >proceed . . .
> >
> > OK, so lets process this from the start. Here is the contents of
> > /var/lib/lrpkg/bindc.list, an old BIND 8.something package:
> >
> >   etc/init.d/bind
> >   etc/named.conf
> >   usr/sbin/named
> >   usr/sbin/ndc
> >   var/lib/lrpkg/bindc.*
> >   var/named
> >
> > Only concentrate on those two etc entries. The package author did not define
> > a .local file to backup just part of the package. The package is running off
> > CD and I can't rewrite it there :-). Finally, even if I could, I DO NOT WANT
> > to. I want to keep this package in whatever form it was delivered for the
> > entire duration of its useful life.

[ snip ]

> Two (2) questions, at this point:
> 
> [1] The *only* way to make your ${pkg}.list modifications stick is to
> perform a backup -- right?  Since your example, bindc.lrp, includes *NO*
> LIST file and you have no time to create one, then you need to backup
  ^^^^
      This should read: LOCAL

> the *entire* package, just to enforce persistence of this modification
> -- right?  If so, what do you gain?  Hopefully, it is not a large
> package, nor that you have only that floppy on which to store it ;<

-- 

Best Regards,

mds
mds resource
888.250.3987

Dare to fix things before they break . . .

Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we
think we know.  The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . .

_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to