At 2002-03-12 17:51 +0100, KP Kirchd�rfer wrote:
>packages - for packages usable with glibc 2.0.x and glibc 2.1.3
>packages-glibc 2.1.3 for packages compiled with glibc 2.1.3 (due to
>various reasons).
KP,
Creation of a packages tree in bin is on my to-do list. I already have a
list of packages [1] on our shell server. I also have a method I wish to
use to create the tree(s).
Method:
* import empty bin/packages tree
? import empty bin/packages/libc-2.0 tree
? import empty bin/packages/libc-2.1 tree
* sort packages by internal dates
* add oldest packages first
(commit message will include packager, program/application name,
and release version)
Does anyone see a problem with this method?
Questions:
How can I determine the lib used in package creation? Do we need separate
trees for lib versions?
[1] http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/packages-list.txt
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
http://leaf-project.org/
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
