Am Dienstag, 12. M�rz 2002 18:26 schrieb Mike Noyes: > At 2002-03-12 17:51 +0100, KP Kirchd�rfer wrote: > >packages - for packages usable with glibc 2.0.x and glibc 2.1.3 > >packages-glibc 2.1.3 for packages compiled with glibc 2.1.3 (due > > to various reasons). > > KP, > Creation of a packages tree in bin is on my to-do list. I already > have a list of packages [1] on our shell server. I also have a > method I wish to use to create the tree(s). > > Method: > * import empty bin/packages tree > ? import empty bin/packages/libc-2.0 tree > ? import empty bin/packages/libc-2.1 tree > * sort packages by internal dates > * add oldest packages first > (commit message will include packager, program/application > name, and release version) > > Does anyone see a problem with this method? > > Questions: > How can I determine the lib used in package creation? Do we need > separate trees for lib versions? > > [1] http://leaf.sourceforge.net/pub/packages-list.txt
At least for the 2.1 tree you shouldn't worry - AFAIK only David and I work with glibc 2.1.3 based packages. I'm pretty shure we'll be able sorting out versions for ourself. kp _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
