On Wednesday 20 March 2002 17:23, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:

> Dang!  There goes my alpha version of LEAF...I guess I'll just have
> to keep my resident Alpha systems running RedHat 7.1 busy crunching
> seti@home work-units (I've got 5 DEC Personal Workstation 500a's,
> three actually running).

I can't say about the Alpha's inclusion to this statement, being that
they have been supported for quite a long time. The 64-bit support
bloat that was referred to seemed to be geared towards the upcoming
Intel and AMD 64-bit processors. It was just something I found while 
perusing the net on the subject.

I was just given a couple of old IBM RISC workstations. I'll have to 
figure out something to do with those. 


> If I ever get back to LEAF development work, I'll look into the newer
> glibc. One of the first things I want to do is build a portable
> compile environment, and other than the compiler itself, the c
> library is about the biggest part of the puzzle, (as well as the
> biggest single chunk of code in most LEAF distributions)...I'd like
> to see what (if anything) can be done to squeeze the c library down
> to size, including various compiler options, as well as compile-time
> defines.

Ah, you're a braver soul than I !  ;-)
-- 

~Lynn Avants
aka Guitarlynn

guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net
http://leaf.sourceforge.net

If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question!

_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to