On Wednesday 20 March 2002 17:23, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > Dang! There goes my alpha version of LEAF...I guess I'll just have > to keep my resident Alpha systems running RedHat 7.1 busy crunching > seti@home work-units (I've got 5 DEC Personal Workstation 500a's, > three actually running).
I can't say about the Alpha's inclusion to this statement, being that they have been supported for quite a long time. The 64-bit support bloat that was referred to seemed to be geared towards the upcoming Intel and AMD 64-bit processors. It was just something I found while perusing the net on the subject. I was just given a couple of old IBM RISC workstations. I'll have to figure out something to do with those. > If I ever get back to LEAF development work, I'll look into the newer > glibc. One of the first things I want to do is build a portable > compile environment, and other than the compiler itself, the c > library is about the biggest part of the puzzle, (as well as the > biggest single chunk of code in most LEAF distributions)...I'd like > to see what (if anything) can be done to squeeze the c library down > to size, including various compiler options, as well as compile-time > defines. Ah, you're a braver soul than I ! ;-) -- ~Lynn Avants aka Guitarlynn guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net http://leaf.sourceforge.net If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question! _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel