Thanks for moving the thread Lynn!
I actualy did set up the config dump.
I now have two new links, one that gives you a single page with all the major
configuration files from /etc and another for all the Shorewall files. These two
lists are hardcoded in the scripts so it is a temporary hack. I would like to
directly link these to the packages so that they are dynamic. I would also like to
make the initial page more dynamic, move it from a static page to a seperate script.
Here are a few of my thoughts.
Reguarless of any changes to the weblet content it would be best to secure it.
If it was secure, this would open the door to web remote management.
Web remote management could start with basic control panel items including:
Bringing interfaces up and down
Bring Shorewall up and down
From their you could eventualy edit the config files directly. I know this is
facilitated fine with the config menus, but if there was a full web interface to LEAF
this would open things up to a much wider audience.
Well, one thing at a time. I will have that demo up soon. It will be easier to talk
about this with a working example for people to comment on.
Richard Amerman
-----Original Message-----
From: guitarlynn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wed 6/26/2002 4:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: [Leaf-devel] Weblet-webconfig
########## Moved from (leaf-user) #############
On Wednesday 26 June 2002 17:33, Richard Amerman wrote:
> I currently have a modification that has a new list of all the
> configuration files on the left side. I have included all the main
> networking files, modules file, ppp files, and all of shorewall.
> I did this with a combination of index.html modification (including
> some cleanup, primarily with an added style entry above that took out
> all the remaining style info bellow) and some changes in the
> showlogsx cgi scripts.
Very nice, Bering is setup nicer in this way. DF's network.conf really
needed to be chopped up to be cleaner in the end. I'm modularizing
the configuration which can reduce the total space taken up and also
allow for reduced (auto-)backup time/resources.
I am planning to look at something along the lines of SSL for
authentication or a SUID binary, but I haven't researched into how
feasible this would be. In any regards, some form of authentication
needs to be implemented.
> I plan on setting up a demo box outside our firewall that everyone
> can access to check out these changes. I will let the list know when
> I have this set up.
Neat, let us know! ;-)
--
~Lynn Avants
aka Guitarlynn
guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net
http://leaf.sourceforge.net
If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question!
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber Inc.
Don't miss the IM event of the season | Special offer for OSDN members!
JabberConf 2002, Aug. 20-22, Keystone, CO http://www.jabberconf.com/osdn
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
N隊X'uiެ+,1ޞ y(*^r&ޭ+9 ͙z
iެ*'m4 M)쬶m
#iޭ'}& }ׯzYXX}ׯzYb,y+m+-.ǟ +-bا~yz
