On Tuesday 02 July 2002 08:33, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > First, a point of order. In my view of the world, there are two > major issues currently being discussed: <snip> > I think it would probably help prevent confusion if mods to the web > server itself refer to sh-httpd, while issues related to making > html/cgi code to monitor or configure the system use the weblet > moniker.
Agreed, I attempted to clarify this earilier. I considered anything with configuration a "seperate entity", but if Weblet is modularized the argument is moot. > With that out of the way, I completely agree with the idea of forming > a "group" to work on the weblet portion of the configuration problem. > This can probably be done with very little effort completely within > the bounds of the existing LEAF SF project. With a CVS directory > somewhere in the existing LEAF tree, folks can share code and > updates, and even developers w/o LEAF SF developer status can > check-out code and posts diffs to the leaf-devel mailing list (much > like the way the busybox list works...I've sent in several bug-fixes > to busybox that got incorperated into the main code-base, but am not > a registered busybox developer). I think the leaf-devel mailing list > will work fine as a communications mechanism for now, and we can > always make a new leaf mailing list if the traffic gets too high for > the leaf-devel list (unlikely, at least for now). This is fine, I was making sure this was an "approved" method in accordance with the site admins. > I can commit to help with the sh-httpd mods, and I think I can > improve the performance of cgi scripts dramatically. I can probably > help with a bit of the html/cgi scripting (ie general architecture > and maybe solving any thorny scripting issues that crop up), but I > don't have time to commit to a huge chunk of the project. I don't have a huge amount of time myself, but I can work on the core integration with the present Release(s) configuration to a script-based one. In honesty, I really haven't gone through much of the present CGI/Weblet scripts yet. If I can catch up with Richard's changes, I'll be happy to help in any manner there as well. It appears that I was working in a reverse order to everyone else... ;-) > It looks like Richard's generally headed in the right direction with > his mods to the existing html/cgi code, especially with the > abstraction of the content. Has anyone else made much progress along > these lines, or should work start on using Richard's framework to > start building a web-config architecture? I think Richard is further along than anyone else with Weblet, I could contribute some form templates and some variable/conf file proposals as well. -- ~Lynn Avants aka Guitarlynn guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net http://leaf.sourceforge.net If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question! ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek No, I will not fix your computer. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
