Everyone,
>From what I'm able to gather from the conversation on debain-legal
pointing to upstream source isn't sufficient to meet GPL requirements.
Did I understand the thread correctly?
Debian Weekly News - July 23rd, 2002
Distributing binary-only CD Images. A [17]request for clarification
was sent to the [18]debian-legal list asking for advice for
[19]distributors of binary-only CDs or images that contain software
licensed under the [20]GNU General Public License. Basically,
whenever one distributes a binary, the receiver has to be able to
obtain the source code as well, at least through mail order on a
physical medium.
17. http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal-0207/msg00192.html
18. http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/
19. http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/
20. http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
http://leaf-project.org/
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
