Le Lundi 13 Janvier 2003 08:43, Allan (reply to list only) a écrit : > Jacques; > > Sorry if I don't understand; Busybox seems to be reading and > interpreting the information given by the kernel correctly, as shown by > /proc/mounts. Yes
> Are you implying that a "df that works" should make assumptions, such as > "if it looks like the same mount, don't show it again"? Wouldn't an > assumption be a bad thing? This is basically what Viro says in the attached reference. My second concern is why the same command (df) should lead to two different results only by upgrading the kernel? My feeling is that the df output should only give one single outcome for root (/) > I'm sure you could submit a patch to BusyBox yourself that would skip a > filesystem type "rootfs", but I don't know whether Erik (et al) would > accept your patch. You could try it... Well I just wanted to outline this pecuriality to the developers. As far as the patch is concerned I leave that with them to decide whether it should be taken into account or not. On the top of that I do not consider myself as a C expert :-( Jacques <snip> > > The reason is that apparently A. Viro decided to show rootfs in > > /proc/mounts startting with the 2.4.19 kernel. The thread is here: > > http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0204.3/0290.html ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel