Erich Titl wrote:
Hi Lynn & group

0.6 looks pretty antiquated to me. I believe they are at 0.99 now. Apparently the C-based stuff is the way they go and should the developers decide this is the way to go I think we should stick with the latest releases.
Not that I have lots of free time, but if someone tries to compile the packaging system for x86 and it doesn't work, I'll commit to taking a look as to why, and see if I can't get it building properly on standard PC's targeting x86 hardware.

I do some embedded stuff for my day job, and am familiar with porting stuff between architectures, using cross-compilers, and etc.

Not saying I'll be able to get it going if it's something that will take a lot of work, but I'll commit to taking the time to look at it if someone else will commit to a test-comile first, verifying there actually *IS* a problem. :)

--
Charles Steinkuehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com - A 128-bit supercerts will
allow you to extend the highest allowed 128 bit encryption to all your clients even if they use browsers that are limited to 40 bit encryption. Get a guide here:http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0030en

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel


Reply via email to