On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 13:20, Martin Hejl wrote:
> > The main difference I see between the Bering branches is the target
> > audience. The uClibc team is targeting enterprise use, while the Bering
> > team is targeting SOHO/end users.
>
> I'm curious - what makes you think so? My day work is "targeting
> enterprise use" (so, I think I know what they'd ask for, but then,
> different customers ask for different things, so one can't be sure), and
> with Bering uClibc, I don't see any of the "buzz-words" that would make
> it in the enterprise world (like SLAs, for example). Maybe my perception
> of Bering uclibc is very different of yours - and if that's so, I'd be
> curious to hear yours.
Martin,
Let me preface this with, "I believe these are good things".
Bering-uClibc
High Availability (fail-over)
http://www.linux-ha.org/
IPv6
http://leaf-project.org/doc/guide/bucu-ipv6.html
6wall
Zebra
http://leaf-project.org/doc/guide/bucu-zebra.html
Comparable to Cisco products in many ways.
--
Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net>
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
