Tom thanks for the details.
At 07:41 02.03.2004 -0800, Tom Eastep wrote: >On Tuesday 02 March 2004 02:31 am, Erich Titl wrote: > >... >The 2.6 native implementation does away with the 'ipsecN' devices. So all >VPN/tunnel types *except* IPSEC use a separate device for tunneling; once the >changes to netfilter to *really* support this implementation are in place, >IPSEC will pass each tunneled packet through the tables twice -- once for the >unencrypted copy of the packet and once for the encrypted packet. Arghhhh.... >.. >I've not personally tried it, Erich -- there was one user on one of the lists >who was seeing traffic in one direction (inbound IIRC) bypassing the ipsec0 >device but I never heard if that was a problem with his tunnel setup or a >feature of openswan... I am subscribed to the freeswan list. I believe I saw the post but believe also it was due to misconfiguration... Thanks again Tom Erich THINK P�ntenstrasse 39 8143 Stallikon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16 ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
