What do you all think, is this an usefull addition? If so i'll see if i can get a patch ready over the (long easter) weekend.
I favor a different approach and would have done it if I would have thought of it before 2.0.0-RC1 was out. We discussed it on the LEAF development list recently so I'm including that list in my post.
I think that all of the shorewall configuration files should be released into /usr/share/shorewall and that only those that the user modifies go in /etc/shorewall/.
I'm willing to do that but it would mean that 2.1 would come out hot on the heals of 2.0 (it's a *big* change in the documentation so it would have to be a major releae). I'd also be willing to wave the 2 major release support rule and continue to support 1.4 until 2.2 is released.
Opinions?
-Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
