In my conception, I'm inclined to look at the CDB not for just config info but as a single repository for all data - config info, package info, user info, performance info etc. Is this way beyond what others look at it as?
Warm regards Mohan > -----Original Message----- > From: Chad Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 10:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] leaf-tools overview (cdb, trig, tmpl) > > I am not a fan. Space can be conserved with binary files, > but editability is sacrificed. XML provides human(?) > readibility/editability, but takes up lots of space. The > filesystem as backing store has always seemed to me to be the > best idea given the constraints. > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
