In my conception, I'm inclined to look at the CDB not for just config info
but as a single repository for all data - config info, package info, user
info, performance info etc. Is this way beyond what others look at it as?

Warm regards
Mohan  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chad Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 10:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] leaf-tools overview (cdb, trig, tmpl)
> 
> I am not a fan.  Space can be conserved with binary files, 
> but editability is sacrificed.  XML provides human(?) 
> readibility/editability, but takes up lots of space.  The 
> filesystem as backing store has always seemed to me to be the 
> best idea given the constraints.
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to